Week 5 objectives: Classical Argument Outline

 1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

- I will start by mentioning the subscribing rates between the Internet news and paper news(the rates of subscribing Internet news has become prevailing rather than its counterpart-paper news). Then, I will cast a question as an attention grabber like- 'Do you read Internet news more frequently than paper news?'. Then I'll end my introduction with this resolution: The newspaper won't disappear despite of Internet news has invaded the domain of paper news.


2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

 - I will show some advantages of reading paper news by quoting Fin Galligan's opinion and I'll draw most compelling advantages of reading paper news and this will show why paper news is still loved by people. Then I'll also some examples that how paper news changes their ways to survive. These examples can be a good rebuttal of the suggestion: Internet news will totally take possession of the paper news domain.

 3. The confirmation, which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

 - I will display three claims that will support my thesis...

  1. Editorial vigor 
   I'll change paper news's disadvantages to strengths. I'll suggest new paradigm of seeing paper news. For example, the space limits of paper news mean that the contents of paper news indicate that the contents are   rigidly selected. 

  2. Depth and breadth
   I'll show the top advantages of paper news: depth and breadth. I'll quote experts opinion and some question     investigation.

  3. The changes of paper news to survive. 
   I'll research some changes of paper news's form and what the transitions indicate about. 


 4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

  I will concede that the subscribing portion of Internet news is dominant rather than subscribing paper news.    However, I'll show the inherent competitiveness of paper news and its strength. 

 5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument,  and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

 I will close with a summary of my previous points, emphasize why paper news won't disappear by Internet news's intrusion, and I will have a brief consideration of the paper news's continuance.